Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Principles, Applications, Limitations, and Considerations

Introduction

 

Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), developed by psychologist Marsha Linehan in the late 1980s, is an evidence-based psychotherapy originally designed to treat borderline personality disorder (BPD). It integrates cognitive-behavioral techniques with mindfulness practices and dialectical philosophy, emphasizing the balance between acceptance and change. DBT has since been adapted for a range of conditions characterized by emotional dysregulation. This paper outlines DBT’s core principles, clinical applications, limitations, and potential risks, providing a critical overview of its role in modern mental health care.

 

DBT was specifically created by Linehan to address the profound struggles of individuals with BPD who were chronically suicidal.1 It originated as a modification of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), recognizing that traditional CBT alone was often insufficient for this population due to the intensity of their emotional distress and self-destructive behaviors.¹ The foundation of DBT is a synthesis of Eastern philosophy, primarily Zen principles of non-judgmental awareness and acceptance, and Western behaviorism.² The core concept of dialectics—balancing acceptance and change—was formalized when a colleague noted the dialectical nature of the therapy Linehan was developing. This philosophical stance, drawn from figures like Georg Hegel, allows for the simultaneous holding of two seemingly opposing truths (e.g., "I am accepted as I am" and "I must change").²

 

 

Principles of DBT

 

DBT is grounded in six key principles:
 

1. Dialectics: Reconciling opposites (e.g., acceptance vs. change) to resolve contradictions and promote holistic understanding.
    
2. Biosocial Theory: Posits that emotional dysregulation stems from biological sensitivity to stress combined with invalidating environments.
    
3. Skills Training: Four core modules—mindfulness (non-judgmental awareness), distress tolerance (crisis management), emotion regulation (managing intense feelings), and interpersonal effectiveness (assertive communication).
    
4. Validation: Balancing acceptance of a client’s experiences with efforts to drive behavioral change.
    
5. Hierarchy of Targets: Prioritizes life-threatening behaviors (e.g., self-harm), therapy-interfering behaviors, and quality-of-life issues.
    
6. Therapist Consultation Teams: Clinicians engage in peer consultation to maintain adherence to DBT principles and prevent burnout.
    

The Biosocial Theory reframes a client’s difficulties, asserting that emotional patterns and difficulties in regulation stem from a transaction between an individual’s inherent biological sensitivities (nature) and an environment (nurture) that may have inadvertently taught them to suppress emotions instead of processing them. This framework avoids blaming the client or their family, emphasizing compassionate understanding and providing a solution-oriented roadmap for healing based on developing self-understanding and practical skills.

 

The four core Skills Training modules are explicitly balanced between acceptance and change:

 

• Acceptance-Oriented Skills include Mindfulness (being fully aware and present) and Distress Tolerance (learning to tolerate pain and survive crises without changing the difficult situation).
   
• Change-Oriented Skills include Emotion Regulation (decreasing vulnerability to painful emotions and effectively modifying emotional responses) and Interpersonal Effectiveness (asserting needs, saying no, and navigating conflict while maintaining self-respect and relationships).
   

The Hierarchy of Targets guides the therapist in prioritizing treatment goals : The highest priority (Stage 1) is Life-Threatening Behaviors (reducing suicidal ideation, self-harm). This is followed by Therapy-Interfering Behaviors and finally Quality-of-Life-Interfering Behaviors (solving ordinary life problems and addressing unhappiness, typically in Stages 3 and 4).

 

 

Clinical Applications

 

DBT is empirically validated for:

 

• Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD): Reduces self-harm, suicidal ideation, and hospitalization rates by addressing emotional instability.
   
• Chronic Suicidality: Teaches crisis survival skills and emotion regulation.
   
• Substance Use Disorders: Integrates harm reduction strategies with relapse prevention.
   
• Eating Disorders: Targets emotional eating and body image distress (e.g., binge-eating disorder).
   
• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Combines exposure therapy with emotion regulation skills.
   
• Mood Disorders: Helps manage intense emotional swings in bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant depression.
   

Emerging applications include ADHD, anger management, and interpersonal conflicts in non-clinical populations.
 

• Quantitative Efficacy and Specialized Protocols: Meta-analyses show DBT provides a medium effect size benefit (pooled Hedges' g −0.622) in reducing parasuicidal behaviors and mitigating suicide risk compared to treatment as usual.⁸ DBT generally yields small to moderate effect sizes in reducing overall BPD symptoms.³
   
• Eating Disorders (ED): DBT protocols demonstrate promising results, yielding very large effect sizes (mean ES 1.90 in single-group studies) for decreasing the frequency of ED episodes.¹⁰ DBT is also found to be more efficacious than control groups in improving emotion dysregulation, ED psychopathology, and BMI.⁷
   
• Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): For adults with severe emotion dysregulation related to ADHD, a meta-analysis showed that DBT moderately reduced ADHD symptoms (SMD = -0.51) and improved quality of life (SMD = 0.41) compared to control conditions. Further evidence suggests significant improvements in inattention (d=1.1) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (d=0.9) symptoms following the intervention.¹³
   
• Anger Management: DBT has been shown to significantly reduce dysregulated anger across various diagnoses (Hedge's G = -0.21).¹
   

Specialized DBT Protocols adapt the comprehensive model for specific comorbid conditions:
 

• DBT for Adolescents (DBT-A): Features adaptations such as mandatory participation in multi-family skills groups (MFSG) where both teens and caregivers attend together.¹⁴
   
• DBT-PE (DBT with Prolonged Exposure): An integrated protocol for clients with both BPD and PTSD, focusing on achieving behavioral control using standard DBT (Stage 1) before moving to the trauma-focused Prolonged Exposure protocol (Stage 2).¹⁵
   

• DBT for Substance Use Disorders (DBT-SUD): Incorporates harm reduction and relapse prevention alongside the core DBT curriculum.

 

 

 

Limitations

 

• Resource Intensity: Requires weekly individual therapy, group skills training, and therapist consultation teams, limiting accessibility.
   
• Commitment Demands: High client dropout rates due to the structured, time-intensive nature.
   
• Cultural Adaptation: Mindfulness practices may conflict with certain religious or cultural beliefs (e.g., stigma around meditation).
   
• Narrow Focus: Prioritizes behavioral stabilization over deep exploration of past trauma or systemic issues (e.g., poverty, discrimination).
   
• Training Barriers: Effective delivery depends on extensive clinician training, which is costly and time-consuming.
   
• Factors Contributing to Limitations: Dropout rates in DBT can be high, varying widely from 0% to 60% across different studies^.17 Key predictors for attrition include younger age, higher baseline distress, and a higher baseline non-acceptance of emotional responses. Other factors that increase dropout risk include a history of childhood emotional abuse, therapist changes, and lack of motivation. Conversely, a strong therapeutic alliance and frequent use of DBT skills (including phone coaching) are associated with lower dropout.¹⁹

 

Cultural Adaptation Challenges mean that direct translation or application may pose problems in certain cultural contexts. For instance, the emphasis on assertive communication in the Interpersonal Effectiveness module may clash with cultures that prioritize community harmony or deference to elders. Successful adaptation requires using culturally relevant examples, translating materials, and adjusting modules to fit the client’s specific social framework.
 

Systemic Implementation Barriers in public health systems include a lack of administrative support or organizational investment in DBT (cited by 42% of clinicians) and the sheer time commitment required, especially when clinicians are unable to reduce their other clinical responsibilities.

 

 

Potential Damages and Ethical Considerations

 

While DBT is generally safe, potential risks include:

 

• Emotional Overload: Skills training or exposure to traumatic memories may temporarily heighten distress.
   
• Invalidation Risks: Poorly balanced acceptance-change strategies may inadvertently dismiss client struggles.
   
• Dependency: Clients may over-rely on therapist support between sessions.
   
• Misapplication: Inadequately trained therapists might misuse dialectical strategies or fail to address comorbid conditions (e.g., psychosis).
   
• Attrition: High dropout rates (up to 60% in some studies) due to the therapy’s demands.
   
• Risks of Misapplication and Ethical Concerns: DBT requires specialized training. Practitioners who lack proper training risk misdiagnosis, delivering inappropriate interventions, or inadvertently exacerbating existing conditions. Furthermore, therapists are generally poor at identifying negative effects in clients when relying solely on clinical judgment and often lack specific training on how to respond to such effects.
   

Ethical considerations are paramount:

 

• Informed Consent: Clients have the right to refuse treatment or withdraw consent at any time. Clinicians are legally and ethically bound to break confidentiality if they have a reasonable belief that the client may harm another person or themselves, or if they suspect child, elder, or dependent adult abuse.
   
• Phone Coaching Boundaries: Phone coaching is a core component, offering clients in-the-moment guidance on skills application during crises. However, this practice, which can occur outside of traditional office hours depending on the therapist's set boundaries, sometimes raises concerns about potential boundary violations or changing the professional relationship into a more personal one.

 

 

Conclusion

 

DBT is a transformative intervention for disorders rooted in emotional dysregulation, particularly BPD and chronic suicidality. Its strengths lie in synthesizing acceptance with skill-building, fostering long-term resilience. However, limitations in accessibility, cultural relevance, and resource demands highlight the need for adaptations, such as brief DBT protocols or teletherapy formats. Future practice should prioritize clinician training, client-centered flexibility, and integrative approaches to address systemic and historical factors.

 

• Long-Term Impact and Future Directions: Despite the high resource intensity of comprehensive DBT, it has proven highly cost-effective in the long term. Standard outpatient DBT has been shown to lead to significant cost savings—averaging nearly $20,000 per person compared to prior treatment—primarily through a substantial decrease in expensive inpatient hospitalizations and emergency room visits.

 

Future research is focused on clarifying the neurobiological mechanisms of change. Preliminary neurobiological findings suggest that BPD patients who complete DBT treatment show decreased activity in brain regions associated with emotional arousal, such as the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC). Utilizing neuroimaging biomarkers holds promise for tracking treatment-related improvement and optimizing future DBT treatments.²⁰

 

The continued success of abbreviated or modular forms of DBT (such as skills training alone) for general psychiatric symptoms suggests pathways for improving accessibility. The use of teletherapy and digital tools (like apps) also offers a means to overcome logistical barriers, provided concerns regarding digital literacy and the strength of the therapeutic alliance in purely digital formats are addressed.

 

References

 

1. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
2. Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT skills training manual (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
3. Lynch, T. R., Trost, W. T., Salsman, N., & Linehan, M. M. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095229
4. Panos, P. T., Jackson, J. W., Hasan, O., & Panos, A. (2014). Meta-analysis and systematic review assessing the efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513503047
5. Harned, M. S., Korslund, K. E., & Linehan, M. M. (2014). A pilot randomized controlled trial of dialectical behavior therapy with and without the DBT prolonged exposure protocol for suicidal and self-injuring women with borderline personality disorder and PTSD. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 55, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.01.008
6. Chen, E. Y., Segal, K., Weissman, J., Zeffiro, T. A., Gallop, R., Linehan, M. M.,... & Lynch, T. R. (2015). Adapting dialectical behavior therapy for outpatient adult anorexia nervosa. Journal of Eating Disorders, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-015-0047-1
7. Neacsiu, A. D., Eberle, J. W., Kramer, R., Wiesmann, T., & Linehan, M. M. (2014). Dialectical behavior therapy skills for transdiagnostic emotion dysregulation: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 59, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2014.05.005
8. Rathus, J. H., & Miller, A. L. (2015). DBT skills manual for adolescents. Guilford Press.
9. Iverson, K. M., Shenk, C., & Fruzzetti, A. E. (2009). Dialectical behavior therapy for women victims of domestic abuse: A pilot study. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013476
10. Valentine, S. E., Bankoff, S. M., Poulin, R. M., Reidler, E. B., & Pantalone, D. W. (2015). The use of dialectical behavior therapy skills training as stand-alone treatment: A systematic review of the treatment outcome literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22114

11. Bedics, J. D., Atkins, D. C., Comtois, K. A., & Linehan, M. M. (2012). Treatment differences in the therapeutic relationship and introject during a 2-year randomized controlled trial of dialectical behavior therapy versus nonbehavioral psychotherapy experts. Psychotherapy, 49(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026134

12. Miller, A. L., Rathus, J. H., & Linehan, M. M. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy with suicidal adolescents. Guilford Press.
13. Ben-Porath, D. D., & Federici, A. (2013). Dialectical behavior therapy: Does it bring about improvements in affect regulation in individuals with eating disorders? Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 43(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-013-9234-z
14. Landecker, H., & Murakami, K. R. (2015). Cultural adaptations of DBT for diverse populations: A review of the literature. International Journal of Psychology Research, 10(1), 45–68.
15. Carmel, A., Rose, M. L., & Fruzzetti, A. E. (2014). Barriers and solutions to implementing dialectical behavior therapy in a public behavioral health system. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 41(5), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0504-14
16. Zhang, S., et al. (2022). Dialectical behavior therapy for reducing anger and aggression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 310, 266–274. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35609374/
17. Partington, D. (2024). How Marsha Linehan created DBT—and how it can help. Psychology Today.
18. Behavioral Tech. (n.d.). Zen and mindfulness in DBT.
19. EBSCO Research Starters. (n.d.). Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT).
20. Palo Alto University. (n.d.). Clinical psychology and the biosocial model: How DBT addresses emotion dysregulation.
21. DBT-UK. (n.d.). The DBT biosocial theory: Bridging the gap in emotional health.
22. University of Washington Behavioral Research & Therapy Clinics. (n.d.). About us: Dialectical behavior therapy.
23. Turn the Mind. (n.d.). DBT target behavior hierarchy.
24. DBT of South Jersey. (n.d.). Stages of DBT treatment.
25. Chapman, K. T., et al. (2018). The efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy in reducing suicide attempts and parasuicidal behavior in patients with borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis. Psychiatric Quarterly, 90, 127–142. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6405261/
26. Mester, B., et al. (2024). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) on symptoms of borderline personality disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10896753/
27. Taylor, B. M., et al. (2014). Effectiveness of Dialectical Behavior Therapy for treating eating disorders. ResearchGate.
28. Schuman, M., et al. (2021). The efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) in improving emotion regulation in eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(9), 2673. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/11/9/931
29. Van Veen, L., et al. (2024). Effectiveness of dialectical behavior therapy for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 85(4). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40513141/
30. Faraone, S. V., et al. (2024). Digital dialectical behavior therapy for emotion dysregulation in adults with ADHD. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10831671/
31. The Counseling Center Group. (n.d.). Marsha Linehan: The genius behind DBT.
32. Alma. (n.d.). What are the subtypes of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT)?
33. DBT with Prolonged Exposure (DBT PE). (n.d.). Treatment overview.
34. Minnesota Department of Human Services. (n.d.). DBT-A FAQ: Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents.
35. Wetzelaer, P., et al. (2024). Efficacy of abbreviated or modular forms of Dialectical Behavior Therapy: A systematic review. International Journal of Mental Health Systems. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12409768/
36. Macpherson, L. M., et al. (2016). Dropout from dialectical behavior therapy: The role of age, baseline distress, and acceptance. Journal of Personality Disorders, 30(5), 632–643. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5007727/
37. Euler, S., et al. (2025). Predictors of dropout in psychotherapy for personality disorders: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
38. Therapy in Barcelona. (n.d.). Navigating cultural nuances in DBT: Practical tips.
39. Poudel, K., et al. (2016). Towards a culturally adapted dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) intervention for Nepalese people in rural communities. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 10(63). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5645023/
40. Carmel, A., et al. (2013). Barriers and solutions to implementing dialectical behavior therapy in a public behavioral health system. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 41(5), 608–614. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23754686/
41. Carmel, A., et al. (2014). Identifying barriers and facilitators to the implementation of dialectical behavior therapy in a public behavioral health system. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 41(5). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3835762/
42. Swift Psychology. (n.d.). The hidden dangers of unqualified talking therapists.
43. Macpherson, L. (2024). The negative effects of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy: What clinicians need to know. International Review of Psychiatry. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12346252/
44. Accessible DBT. (n.d.). Informed consent for treatment.
45. Roberts, L. W. (2019). Informed consent: Essential to ethical and compassionate clinical care. Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 17(2), 211–214. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6493245/

46. Viana, P. F., et al. (2024). “On call” or “on speed dial”? Exploring the ethical and practical considerations of DBT phone coaching. Current Opinion in Psychology. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11539202/

47. Chapman, A. L. (2009). Ethical and legal considerations in dialectical behavior therapy. Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/excerpts/chapman.pdf
48. Behavioral Tech. (n.d.). DBT's impact on mental healthcare costs.
49. Wang, F., et al. (2022). Neurobiological changes following dialectical behavior therapy in borderline personality disorder: A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Frontiers in Psychiatry. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8718753/
50. Williams, S. K., & Lally, R. (2024). Digital psychotherapy: Efficacy of online CBT and teletherapy platforms. Mathews Open Access.
51. Yale Medicine. (n.d.). Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT).

52. DBT Skills. (n.d.). Components of DBT.